Erotic Love | Part A’ (Fromm)

Erotic Love | Part A’ (Fromm)

Brotherly love is love among equals; motherly love is love for the helpless. Different as they are from each other, they have in common that they are by their very nature not restricted to one person. If I love my brother, I love all my brothers; if I love my child, I love all my children; no, beyond that, I love all children, all that are in need of my help. In contrast to both types of love is erotic love; it is the craving for complete fusion, for union with one other person. It is by its very nature exclusive and not universal; it is also perhaps the most deceptive form of love there is.

First of all, it is often confused with the explosive experience of lolling” in love, which existed until that moment between two strangers. But, it was pointed out before, this experience of sudden intimacy by its very nature short-lived. After the stranger has become an intimately known person there are no more barriers to be overcome, there is no more sudden closeness to be thieved. The “loved” person becomes as well known as onesdf. Or, perhaps I should better say as little known. If there were more depth in the experience of the other person, one could experience the infiniteness of his personality, the other person would never be so familiar—and the miracle of overcoming the barriers might occur every day anew. But for most people their own person, as well as others, is soon explored and soon exhausted. For them intimacy is established primarily through sexual contact. Since they experience the separateness of the other person primarily as physical separateness, physical union means overcoming separateness.
Beyond that, there are other factors which to many people denote the overcoming of separateness. To speak of one’s own personal life, one’s hopes and anxieties, to show oneself with one’s childlike or childish aspects, to establish a common interest vis-a-vis the world—all this is taken as overc oming separateness. Even to show one’s anger, one’s hate, one’s complete lack of inhibition is taken for intimacy, and this may explain the perverted attraction married couples often have for each other, who seem intimate only when they are in bed or when they give vent to their mutual hate and rage. But all these types of closeness tend to become reduced more and more as time goes on. The consequence is one seeks love with a new person, with a new stranger. Again the stranger is transformed into an “intimate” person, again the experience of falling in love is exhilarating and intense, and again it slowly becomes less and less intense, and ends in the wish for a new conquest, a new love—always with the illusion that the new love will be different from the earlier ones. These illusions are greatly helped by the deceptive character of sexual desire.

In erotic love there is an exclusiveness which is lacking in brotherly love and motherly love. This exclusive character of erotic love warrants some further discussion. Frequently the exclusiveness of erotic love is misinterpreted as meaning possessive attachment. One can often find two people “in love” with each other who feel no love for anybody else. Their love is, in fact, an egotism a deux; they are two people who identify themselves with each other, and who solve the problem of separateness by enlarging the single individual into two. They have the experience of overcoming aloneness, yet, since they are separated from the rest of mankind, they remain separated from each other and alienated from themselves; their experience of union is an illusion. Erotic love is exclusive, but it loves in the other person all of mankind, all that is alive. It is exclusive only in the sense that I can fuse myself fully and intensely with one person only. Erotic love excludes the love for others only in the sense of erotic fusion, full commitment in all aspects of life—but not in the sense of deep brotherly love. Erotic love, if it is love, has one premise. That I love from the essence of my being—and experience the other person in the essence of his or her being. In essence, all human beings are identical. We are all part of One; we are One. This being so, it should not make any difference whom we love. Love should be essentially an act of will, of decision to cornmit my ‘life completely to that of one other person. This is, indeed, the rationale behind- the idea of the insolubility of marriage, as it is behind the many forms of traditional marriage in which the two partners never choose each other, but are chosen for each other—and yet are expected to love each other. In contemporary Western culture this idea appears altogether false. Love is supposed to be the outcome of a spontaneous, emotional reaction, of suddenly being gripped by an irresistible feeling. In this view, one sees only the peculiarities of the two individuals involved—and not the fact that all men are part of Adam, and all women part of Eve. One neglects to see an important factor in erotic love, that of will. To love somebody is not just a strong feeling—it is a decision, it is a judgment, it is a promise. If love were only a feeling, there would be no basis for the promise to love each other forever. A feeling comes and it may go. How can I judge that it will stay forever, when my act does not involve judgment and decision?
Taking these views into account one may arrive at the position that love is exclusively an act of will and commitment, and that therefore fundamentally it does not matter who the two persons are. Whether the marriage was arranged by others, or the result of individual choice, once the marriage is concluded, the act of will should guarantee the continuation of love. This view seems to neglect the paradoxical character of human nature and of erotic love. We are all One—yet every one of us is a unique, unduplicable entity. In our relationships to others the same paradox is repeated. Inasmuch as we are all one, we can love everybody in the same way in the sense of brotherly love. But in as much as we are all also different, erotic love requires certain specific, highly individual elements which exist between some people but not between all. Both views then, that of erotic love as completely individual attraction, unique between two specific persons, as well as the other view that erotic love is nothing but an act of will, are true—or, as it may be put more aptly, the truth is neither this nor that. Hence the idea of a relationship which can be easily dissolved if one is not successful with it is as erroneous as the idea that under no circumstances must the relationship be dissolved.

 

 

 

 
THE ART OF LOVING
Erich Fromm



Facebook

Instagram

Follow Me on Instagram
  • And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by THOSE WHO COULD NOT HEAR THE MUSIC ...

    lecturesbureau: "And those who were seen dancing
were thought to be insane
by THOSE WHO COULD NOT HEAR THE MUSIC ..."
    223
    0
  • Life is so unpredictable that anything is possible .

    lecturesbureau: "Life is so unpredictable that anything is possible ."
    262
    0
  • I LIVE IN MY DREAMS . Other people live in dreams , but not in their own . That's the difference .

    lecturesbureau: "I LIVE IN MY DREAMS .
Other people live in dreams , but not in their own .
That's the difference ."
    345
    2
  • All my life I've looked at words as though I were seeing them for the first time .

    lecturesbureau: "All my life I've looked at words
as though I were seeing them for the first time ."
    256
    0
  • Medicine heals deseases of the body wisdom frees the soul from passions .

    lecturesbureau: "Medicine heals deseases of the body
wisdom frees the soul from passions ."
    493
    1
  • It does not matter how slowly you go so long as you do not stop .

    lecturesbureau: "It does not matter how slowly you go 
so long as you do not stop ."
    352
    2
  • A book read by a thousand different people is a thousand different books .

    lecturesbureau: "A book read by a thousand different people
is a thousand different books ."
    611
    0
  • Our chief want is someone who will inspire us to be WHAT WE KNOW WE COULD BE .

    lecturesbureau: "Our chief want is someone who will inspire us
to be WHAT WE KNOW WE COULD BE ."
    269
    2
  • The bee discovers amid the most pungent flowers and the roughest thorns the smoothest and most palatable honey .

    lecturesbureau: "The bee discovers amid the most pungent flowers
and the roughest thorns
the smoothest and most palatable honey ."
    108
    0
  • Without joy in our heart , our progress in life is slow and uninteresting .

    lecturesbureau: "Without joy in our heart ,
our progress in life 
is slow and uninteresting ."
    220
    0